Quenya101 — I will say no more, as you are easily wound! My mind has not been changed since I asked why you did not like the use of “Elvish”, and you answered that it was for “lay people”. You also gave me a question to answer (more of a bet, actually) and I did answer it, whether you liked the answer or not. Seeing as you should live up to your word, you’re supposed to use the term “Elvish” from now on. Now, let us end our “Riddles in the Dark”. What have I got in my pocket? Oh, wait, I don’t have one. :P

Answer

I will say no more, as you are easily wound! My mind has not been changed since I asked why you did not like the use of "Elvish", and you answered that it was for "lay people". You also gave me a question to answer (more of a bet, actually) and I did answer it, whether you liked the answer or not. Seeing as you should live up to your word, you're supposed to use the term "Elvish" from now on. Now, let us end our "Riddles in the Dark". What have I got in my pocket? Oh, wait, I don't have one. :P

fattybolger asked

Easily wound? Really?

I’m here exposing facts, laying reasonable arguments about how absurd is naming things with dubious terms open to major misinterpretations, due to the plurality of objects with the same quality AND….now you’re the smart one who answered the question (because you simply DID NOT understand the question) and I AM the easily wound.

I’m not bleeding now, dude, nor hurt nor in pain.

I’m perfectly sound and ok, answering your private messages publicly by the way.